↓ Skip to main content

Use of weeds as traditional vegetables in Shurugwi District, Zimbabwe

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of weeds as traditional vegetables in Shurugwi District, Zimbabwe
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfred Maroyi

Abstract

Most agricultural weeds are usually regarded as undesirable and targeted for eradication. However, weeds are useful to human beings as food and traditional medicines. Few studies have been done to document the uses of weeds as traditional vegetables. This study was therefore, done to document indigenous knowledge related to the diversity and use of agricultural weeds as traditional vegetables in Shurugwi District, Zimbabwe, emphasizing their role in food security and livelihoods of the local people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 225 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Unspecified 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 53 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 24%
Unspecified 21 9%
Environmental Science 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,768,162
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#257
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,647
of 198,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.