You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phylogenetic analysis of faecal microbiota from captive cheetahs reveals underrepresentation of Bacteroidetes and Bifidobacteriaceae
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Microbiology, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-14-43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne AMJ Becker, Myriam Hesta, Joke Hollants, Geert PJ Janssens, Geert Huys |
Abstract |
Imbalanced feeding regimes may initiate gastrointestinal and metabolic diseases in endangered felids kept in captivity such as cheetahs. Given the crucial role of the host's intestinal microbiota in feed fermentation and health maintenance, a better understanding of the cheetah's intestinal ecosystem is essential for improvement of current feeding strategies. We determined the phylogenetic diversity of the faecal microbiota of the only two cheetahs housed in an EAZA associated zoo in Flanders, Belgium, to gain first insights in the relative distribution, identity and potential role of the major community members. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 33% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,577,301
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#70
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,676
of 238,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.