You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Were medicine quality and pharmaceutical management contributing factors in diminishing artemisinin efficacy in Guyana and Suriname?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-77 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Victor S Pribluda, Lawrence Evans, Edgar Barillas, John Marmion, Patrick Lukulay, Jaime Chang |
Abstract |
Recent studies in Guyana and Suriname unveiled diminished efficacy of artemisinin derivatives based on day-3 parasitaemia. The migrant characteristics of the population at risk and the potential development of resistance pose a serious health threat in the region. Assessment of factors that may have contributed to this situation is warranted, and analysis of the data generated in those countries on quality and pharmaceutical managements of anti-malarials may contribute to a better understanding of this occurrence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,692,809
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#610
of 5,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,455
of 221,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.