↓ Skip to main content

The genome and life-stage specific transcriptomes of Globodera pallida elucidate key aspects of plant parasitism by a cyst nematode

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The genome and life-stage specific transcriptomes of Globodera pallida elucidate key aspects of plant parasitism by a cyst nematode
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r43
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A Cotton, Catherine J Lilley, Laura M Jones, Taisei Kikuchi, Adam J Reid, Peter Thorpe, Isheng J Tsai, Helen Beasley, Vivian Blok, Peter J Cock, Sebastian Eves-van den Akker, Nancy Holroyd, Martin Hunt, Sophie Mantelin, Hardeep Naghra, Arnab Pain, Juan E Palomares-Rius, Magdalena Zarowiecki, Matthew Berriman, John T Jones, Peter E Urwin

Abstract

Globodera pallida is a devastating pathogen of potato crops, making it one of the most economically important plant parasitic nematodes. It is also an important model for the biology of cyst nematodes. Cyst nematodes and root-knot nematodes are the two most important plant parasitic nematode groups and together represent a global threat to food security.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 235 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 22%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Other 14 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 35 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 14%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 41 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,524,078
of 20,497,524 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,462
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,879
of 200,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,497,524 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them