You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamics of chromatin accessibility and gene regulation by MADS-domain transcription factors in flower development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Pajoro, Pedro Madrigal, Jose M Muiño, José Tomás Matus, Jian Jin, Martin A Mecchia, Juan M Debernardi, Javier F Palatnik, Salma Balazadeh, Muhammad Arif, Diarmuid S Ó’Maoiléidigh, Frank Wellmer, Pawel Krajewski, José-Luis Riechmann, Gerco C Angenent, Kerstin Kaufmann |
| Abstract |
Development of eukaryotic organisms is controlled by transcription factors that trigger specific and global changes in gene expression programs. In plants, MADS-domain transcription factors act as master regulators of developmental switches and organ specification. However, the mechanisms by which these factors dynamically regulate the expression of their target genes at different developmental stages are still poorly understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 261 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 26% |
| Researcher | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 59 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,594,327
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,074
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,616
of 236,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#40
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.