You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of MRI in primary care for patients with knee complaints due to trauma: protocol of a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (TACKLE trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nynke M Swart, Kim van Oudenaarde, Paul R Algra, Partick JE Bindels, Wilbert B van den Hout, Bart W Koes, Rob GHH Nelissen, Jan AN Verhaar, Hans JL Bloem, Sita MA Bierma-Zeinstra, Monique Reijnierse, Pim AJ Luijsterburg |
| Abstract |
Patients with traumatic knee complaints regularly consult their general practitioner (GP). MRI might be a valuable diagnostic tool to assist GPs in making appropriate treatment decisions and reducing costs. Therefore, this study will assess the cost-effectiveness of referral to MRI by GPs compared with usual care, in patients with persistent traumatic knee complaints. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 75% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,341,334
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,490
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,992
of 221,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#36
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.