↓ Skip to main content

Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alarcos Cieza, Cornelia Oberhauser, Jerome Bickenbach, Somnath Chatterji, Gerold Stucki

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has argued that functioning, and, more concretely, functioning domains constitute the operationalization that best captures our intuitive notion of health. Functioning is, therefore, a major public-health goal. A great deal of data about functioning is already available. Nonetheless, it is not possible to compare and optimally utilize this information. One potential approach to address this challenge is to propose a generic and minimal set of functioning domains that captures the experience of individuals and populations with respect to functioning and health. The objective of this investigation was to identify a minimal generic set of ICF domains suitable for describing functioning in adults at both the individual and population levels.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 12 15%
Professor 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Psychology 10 13%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 15 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,107,476
of 4,506,762 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,199
of 5,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,542
of 108,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#239
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.