↓ Skip to main content

Sero-prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus infection among pregnant women in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sero-prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus infection among pregnant women in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yohannes Zenebe, Wondemagegn Mulu, Mulat Yimer, Bayeh Abera

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are the two most important agents of infectious diseases. Both HBV and HIV share common modes of transmission and have serious effects on both pregnant women and infants. In Bahir Dar city administration, there is a scarcity of information on sero-prevalence of HIV and HBV infection among pregnant women. The main objective of this study was to assess sero-prevalence and risk factors of HIV and HBV infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 25%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,715,061
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,087
of 7,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,342
of 222,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#99
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.