You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geometric morphometrics defines shape differences in the cortical area map of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-7-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David C Airey, Fangbai Wu, Monica Guan, Christine E Collins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 56% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2012.
All research outputs
#4,058,907
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#181
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,591
of 67,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them