You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gm381 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Curtis R Coughlin, Gunter H Scharer, Tamim H Shaikh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2012.
All research outputs
#5,559,705
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,011
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,004
of 204,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.