↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Anaemia and Associated Risk Factors among Children in North-western Uganda: A Cross Sectional Study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Hematology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of Anaemia and Associated Risk Factors among Children in North-western Uganda: A Cross Sectional Study
Published in
BMC Hematology, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12878-017-0081-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ismail Dragon Legason, Alex Atiku, Ronald Ssenyonga, Peter Olupot-Olupot, John Banson Barugahare

Abstract

Despite the public health significance of anaemia in African children, its broader and often preventable risk factors remain largely under described. This study investigated, for the first time, the prevalence of childhood anaemia and its risk factors in an urban setting in Uganda. A total of 342 children were enrolled. Venous blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and analyzed using Symex 500i (Symex Corp. Japan). Stool and urine samples were analyzed according to established standard methods. Anthropometric indicators were calculated according to the CDC/WHO 1978 references. Ethical approval was granted. Categorically, the prevalence of anaemia was; 37.2, 33.3 and 11.8% among children aged 1-5 years, 6-11 years and 12-14 years respectively. Overall anaemia prevalence was 34.4%. The risk of anaemia was higher among males than females [(OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.8, 2.1), P = .22]. Malaria was associated with a 1.5 times risk of anaemia though not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (P = .19). Maternal parity <5 (P = .002), and stunting [(OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.3, 4.7), P = .004] were positively associated with anaemia. There was a positive correlation between household size and income (Pearson X(2)  = 22.96; P = .001), implying that large families were of higher socioeconomic status. This study demonstrates that anaemia is more prevalent in the under-5 age. The risk factors are stunting and low maternal parity. Interventions that address nutritional deficiencies in both pre-school and school children are recommended. Malaria and helminthiasis control measures counter the risk of anaemia. Further studies are required to investigate the association between maternal parity and anaemia found in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Researcher 18 8%
Lecturer 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 80 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 45 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 85 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,558,284
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Hematology
#55
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,085
of 313,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Hematology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them