↓ Skip to main content

A combined in vitro / in vivo selection for polymerases with novel promoter specificities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A combined in vitro / in vivo selection for polymerases with novel promoter specificities
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, December 2001
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-1-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jijumon Chelliserrykattil, George Cai, Andrew D Ellington

Abstract

The DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from T7 bacteriophage (T7 RNAP) has been extensively characterized, and like other phage RNA polymerases it is highly specific for its promoter. A combined in vitro/in vivo selection method has been developed for the evolution of T7 RNA polymerases with altered promoter specificities. Large (10(3)-10(6)) polymerase libraries were made and cloned downstream of variant promoters. Those polymerase variants that can recognize variant promoters self-amplify both themselves and their attendant mRNAs in vivo. Following RT / PCR amplification in vitro, the most numerous polymerase genes are preferentially cloned and carried into subsequent rounds of selection. A T7 RNA polymerase library that was randomized at three positions was cloned adjacent to a T3-like promoter sequence, and a 'specialist' T7 RNA polymerase was identified. A library that was randomized at a different set of positions was cloned adjacent to a promoter library in which four positions had been randomized, and 'generalist' polymerases that could utilize a variety of T7 promoters were identified, including at least one polymerase with an apparently novel promoter specificity. This method may have applications for evolving other polymerase variants with novel phenotypes, such as the ability to incorporate modified nucleotides.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 29%
Chemistry 9 14%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,513,532
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#209
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,269
of 130,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them