↓ Skip to main content

Phenotyping community-acquired pneumonia according to the presence of acute respiratory failure and severe sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotyping community-acquired pneumonia according to the presence of acute respiratory failure and severe sepsis
Published in
Respiratory Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-15-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Aliberti, Anna Maria Brambilla, James D Chalmers, Catia Cilloniz, Julio Ramirez, Angelo Bignamini, Elena Prina, Eva Polverino, Paolo Tarsia, Alberto Pesci, Antoni Torres, Francesco Blasi, Roberto Cosentini

Abstract

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) and severe sepsis (SS) are possible complications in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of the study was to evaluate prevalence, characteristics, risk factors and impact on mortality of hospitalized patients with CAP according to the presence of ARF and SS on admission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,762
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,104
of 236,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.