↓ Skip to main content

Response to antiretroviral therapy (ART): comparing women with previous use of zidovudine monotherapy (ZDVm) in pregnancy with ART naïve women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to antiretroviral therapy (ART): comparing women with previous use of zidovudine monotherapy (ZDVm) in pregnancy with ART naïve women
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susie Huntington, Claire Thorne, Jane Anderson, Marie-Louise Newell, Graham P Taylor, Deenan Pillay, Teresa Hill, Pat Tookey, Caroline Sabin, the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study, the National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC)

Abstract

Short-term zidovudine monotherapy (ZDVm) remains an option for some pregnant HIV-positive women not requiring treatment for their own health but may affect treatment responses once antiretroviral therapy (ART) is subsequently started.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 3%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,884
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,619
of 222,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#74
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.