↓ Skip to main content

Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/alzrt63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kinga Szigeti, Rachelle S Doody

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Neuroscience 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2011.
All research outputs
#1,283,584
of 8,027,259 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#211
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,956
of 105,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,027,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.