↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol: cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of a staff training intervention in inpatient mental health rehabilitation units in increasing…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol: cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of a staff training intervention in inpatient mental health rehabilitation units in increasing service users’ engagement in activities
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Killaspy, Sarah Cook, Tim Mundy, Thomas Craig, Frank Holloway, Gerard Leavey, Louise Marston, Paul McCrone, Leonardo Koeser, Maurice Arbuthnott, Rumana Z Omar, Michael King

Abstract

This study focuses on people with complex and severe mental health problems who require inpatient rehabilitation. The majority have a diagnosis of schizophrenia whose recovery has been delayed due to non-response to first-line treatments, cognitive impairment, negative symptoms and co-existing problems such as substance misuse. These problems contribute to major impairments in social and everyday functioning necessitating lengthy admissions and high support needs on discharge to the community. Engagement in structured activities reduces negative symptoms of psychosis and may lead to improvement in function, but no trials have been conducted to test the efficacy of interventions that aim to achieve this.Methods/design: This study aims to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a staff training intervention to increase service users' engagement in activities. This is a single-blind, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial involving 40 inpatient mental health rehabilitation units across England. Units are randomised on an equal basis to receive either standard care or a "hands-on", manualised staff training programme comprising three distinct phases (predisposing, enabling and reinforcing) delivered by a small team of psychiatrists, occupational therapists, service users and activity workers. The primary outcome is service user engagement in activities 12 months after randomisation, assessed using a standardised measure. Secondary outcomes include social functioning and costs and cost-effectiveness of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,134,874
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,035
of 5,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,094
of 206,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#33
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.