↓ Skip to main content

Imaging of carotid artery vessel wall edema using T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging of carotid artery vessel wall edema using T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Ølgaard Bloch, Anne Yoon Krogh Grøndal Hansen, Steen Fjord Pedersen, Jesper Langhoff Honge, Won Yong Kim, Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen

Abstract

Atherothrombosis remains a major health problem in the western world, and carotid atherosclerosis is an important contributor to embolic ischemic strokes. It remains a clinical challenge to identify rupture-prone atherosclerotic plaques before clinical events occur. Inflammation, endothelial injury and angiogenesis are features of vulnerable plaques and may all be associated with plaque edema. Therefore, vessel wall edema, which can be detected by 2D T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), may be used as a dynamic marker of disease activity in the atherosclerotic plaque. However, 2D imaging is limited by low spatial resolution in the slice-select direction compared to 3D imaging techniques. We sought to investigate the ability of novel 3D techniques to detect edema induced in porcine carotid arteries by acute balloon injury compared to conventional 2D T2-weighted black-blood CMR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,743,774
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#593
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,477
of 236,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.