You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating effects of land management on greenhouse gas fluxes and carbon balances in boreo-temperate lowland peatland systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-3-5 |
| Authors |
Neal R Haddaway, Annette Burden, Chris D Evans, John R Healey, Davey L Jones, Sarah E Dalrymple, Andrew S Pullin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Canada | 2 | 15% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 43 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,240,200
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#123
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,597
of 236,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.