↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled trial of an open lung strategy with staircase recruitment, titrated PEEP and targeted low airway pressures in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled trial of an open lung strategy with staircase recruitment, titrated PEEP and targeted low airway pressures in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Critical Care, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol L Hodgson, David V Tuxen, Andrew R Davies, Michael J Bailey, Alisa M Higgins, Anne E Holland, Jenny L Keating, David V Pilcher, Andrew J Westbrook, David J Cooper, Alistair D Nichol

Abstract

Tidal volume and plateau pressure minimisation are the standard components of a protective lung ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Open lung strategies, including higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres to date have not proven efficacious. This study examines the effectiveness and safety of a novel open lung strategy, which includes permissive hypercapnia, staircase recruitment manoeuvres (SRM) and low airway pressure with PEEP titration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 20%
Other 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 61 30%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Psychology 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 30 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,618,010
of 21,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,312
of 5,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,720
of 201,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#36
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.