↓ Skip to main content

Ethnic variation in validity of classification of overweight and obesity using self-reported weight and height in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnic variation in validity of classification of overweight and obesity using self-reported weight and height in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2005
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-4-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

RF Gillum, Christopher T Sempos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 25 29%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Social Sciences 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,770,705
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#809
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,186
of 59,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.