↓ Skip to main content

Inappropriate empiric antifungal therapy for candidemia in the ICU and hospital resource utilization: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inappropriate empiric antifungal therapy for candidemia in the ICU and hospital resource utilization: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marya D Zilberberg, Marin H Kollef, Heather Arnold, Andrew Labelle, Scott T Micek, Smita Kothari, Andrew F Shorr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 23 31%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,809,112
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,642
of 7,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,115
of 98,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.