You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pyramiding, alternating or mixing: comparative performances of deployment strategies of nematode resistance genes to promote plant resistance efficiency and durability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-14-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline Djian-Caporalino, Alain Palloix, Ariane Fazari, Nathalie Marteu, Arnaud Barbary, Pierre Abad, Anne-Marie Sage-Palloix, Thierry Mateille, Sabine Risso, Roger Lanza, Catherine Taussig, Philippe Castagnone-Sereno |
| Abstract |
Resistant cultivars are key elements for pathogen control and pesticide reduction, but their repeated use may lead to the emergence of virulent pathogen populations, able to overcome the resistance. Increased research efforts, mainly based on theoretical studies, explore spatio-temporal deployment strategies of resistance genes in order to maximize their durability. We evaluated experimentally three of these strategies to control root-knot nematodes: cultivar mixtures, alternating and pyramiding resistance genes, under controlled and field conditions over a 3-years period, assessing the efficiency and the durability of resistance in a protected crop rotation system with pepper as summer crop and lettuce as winter crop. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,024
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,822
of 239,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.