You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How collaborative are quality improvement collaboratives: a qualitative study in stroke care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pam Carter, Piotr Ozieranski, Sarah McNicol, Maxine Power, Mary Dixon-Woods |
| Abstract |
Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) continue to be widely used, yet evidence for their effectiveness is equivocal. We sought to explain what happened in Stroke 90:10, a QIC designed to improve stroke care in 24 hospitals in the North West of England. Our study drew in part on the literature on collective action and inter-organizational collaboration. This literature has been relatively neglected in evaluations of QICs, even though they are founded on principles of co-operation and sharing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 27% |
| United States | 13 | 13% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 47 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 50% |
| Scientists | 28 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Psychology | 12 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#727,730
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#72
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,586
of 235,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.