↓ Skip to main content

Structural adjustment programmes adversely affect vulnerable populations: a systematic-narrative review of their effect on child and maternal health

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 278)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural adjustment programmes adversely affect vulnerable populations: a systematic-narrative review of their effect on child and maternal health
Published in
Public Health Reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40985-017-0059-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Thomson, Alexander Kentikelenis, Thomas Stubbs

Abstract

Structural adjustment programmes of international financial institutions have typically set the fiscal parameters within which health policies operate in developing countries. Yet, we currently lack a systematic understanding of the ways in which these programmes impact upon child and maternal health. The present article systematically reviews observational and quasi-experimental articles published from 2000 onward in electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar) and grey literature from websites of key organisations (IMF, World Bank and African Development Bank). Studies were considered eligible if they empirically assessed the aggregate effect of structural adjustment programmes on child or maternal health in developing countries. Of 1961 items yielded through database searches, reference lists and organisations' websites, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Our review finds that structural adjustment programmes have a detrimental impact on child and maternal health. In particular, these programmes undermine access to quality and affordable healthcare and adversely impact upon social determinants of health, such as income and food availability. The evidence suggests that a fundamental rethinking is required by international financial institutions if developing countries are to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals on child and maternal health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 284 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 90 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 65 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 98 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#192,872
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#6
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,039
of 325,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them