↓ Skip to main content

Local infiltration of analgesia and sciatic nerve block provide similar pain relief after total knee arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local infiltration of analgesia and sciatic nerve block provide similar pain relief after total knee arthroplasty
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0616-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidenori Tanikawa, Kengo Harato, Ryo Ogawa, Tomoyuki Sato, Shu Kobayashi, So Nomoto, Yasuo Niki, Kazunari Okuma

Abstract

Although femoral nerve block provides satisfactory analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), residual posterior knee pain may decrease patient satisfaction. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to clarify the efficacy of the sciatic nerve block (SNB) and local infiltration of analgesia with steroid (LIA) regarding postoperative analgesia after TKA, when administrated in addition to femoral nerve block (FNB). Seventy-eight patients were randomly allocated to the two groups: concomitant administration of FNB and SNB or FNB and LIA. The outcome measures included post-operative pain, passive knee motion, C-reactive protein level, time to achieve rehabilitation goals, the Knee Society Score at the time of discharge, patient satisfaction level with anesthesia, length of hospital stay, surgical time, and complications related to local anesthesia. The patients in group SNB showed less pain than group LIA only on postoperative hours 0 and 3. Satisfactory postoperative analgesia after TKA was also achieved with LIA combined with FNB, while averting the risks associated with SNB. The influence on progress of rehabilitation and length of hospital stay was similar for both anesthesia techniques. The LIA offers a potentially safer alternative to SNB as an adjunct to FNB, particularly for patients who have risk factors for sciatic nerve injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Engineering 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,482,068
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#252
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,984
of 312,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.