↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating local vegetation cover as a risk factor for malaria transmission: a new analytical approach using ImageJ

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating local vegetation cover as a risk factor for malaria transmission: a new analytical approach using ImageJ
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-94
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily E Ricotta, Steven A Frese, Cornelius Choobwe, Thomas A Louis, Clive J Shiff

Abstract

In places where malaria transmission is unstable or is transmitted under hypoendemic conditions, there are periods where limited foci of cases still occur and people become infected. These residual "hot spots" are likely reservoirs of the parasite population and so are fundamental to the seasonal spread and decline of malaria. It is, therefore, important to understand the ecological conditions that permit vector mosquitoes to survive and forage in these specific areas. Features such as local waterways and vegetation, as well as local ecology, particularly nocturnal temperature, humidity, and vegetative sustainability, are important for modeling local mosquito behavior. Vegetation around a homestead likely provides refuge for outdoor resting of these insects and may be a risk factor for malaria transmission. Analysis of this vegetation can be done using satellite information and mapping programs, such as Google Earth, but manual quantification is difficult and can be tedious and subjective. A more objective method is required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Rwanda 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Environmental Science 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,295,786
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,464
of 5,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,106
of 221,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#60
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.