↓ Skip to main content

Translation of evidence-based Assistive Technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translation of evidence-based Assistive Technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann-Marie Hughes, Jane Helena Burridge, Sara Holtum Demain, Caroline Ellis-Hill, Claire Meagher, Lisa Tedesco-Triccas, Ruth Turk, Ian Swain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 49 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 33 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 14%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 55 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,214
of 8,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,279
of 239,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#59
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.