↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of complementary feeding practices in South Asian infants and young children: the Bangladesh perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nutrition, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 289)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of complementary feeding practices in South Asian infants and young children: the Bangladesh perspective
Published in
BMC Nutrition, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40795-017-0176-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Logan Manikam, Alexandra Robinson, Jia Ying Kuah, Hrisheekesh J. Vaidya, Emma C. Alexander, George W. Miller, Kunjshri K. Singh, Victoria Dawe, Sonia Ahmed, Raghu Lingam, Monica Lakhanpaul

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 47 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,191,593
of 19,265,364 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nutrition
#45
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,177
of 277,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nutrition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,265,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them