↓ Skip to main content

Imagine a world without cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
45 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imagine a world without cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn LDM Brücher, Gary Lyman, Richard van Hillegersberg, Raphael E Pollock, Florian Lordick, Han-Kwang Yang, Toshikazu Ushijima, Khay-Guan Yeoh, Tomas Skricka, Wojciech Polkowski, Grzegorz Wallner, Vic Verwaal, Alfredo Garofalo, Domenico D’Ugo, Franco Roviello, Hans-Ulrich Steinau, Timothy J Wallace, Martin Daumer, Nitah Maihle, Thomas J Reid, Michel Ducreux, Yuko Kitagawa, Alexander Knuth, Bruno Zilberstein, Scott R Steele, Ijaz S Jamall

Abstract

Since the "War on Cancer" was declared in 1971, the United States alone has expended some $300 billion on research, with a heavy focus on the role of genomics in anticancer therapy. Voluminous data have been collected and analyzed. However, in hindsight, any achievements made have not been realized in clinical practice in terms of overall survival or quality of life extended. This might be justified because cancer is not one disease but a conglomeration of multiple diseases, with widespread heterogeneity even within a single tumor type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 20 32%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,230,989
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#161
of 8,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,642
of 223,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#4
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.