Title |
Objectively measured physical environmental neighbourhood factors are not associated with accelerometer-determined total sedentary time in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12966-017-0551-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sofie Compernolle, Katrien De Cocker, Joreintje D. Mackenbach, Femke Van Nassau, Jeroen Lakerveld, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Compernolle, Sofie, De Cocker, Katrien, Mackenbach, Joreintje D, Van Nassau, Femke, Lakerveld, Jeroen, Cardon, Greet, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse |
Abstract |
The physical neighbourhood environment may influence adults' sedentary behaviour. Yet, most studies examining the association between the physical neighbourhood environment and sedentary behaviour rely on self-reported data of either the physical neighbourhood environment and/or sedentary behaviour. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between objectively measured physical environmental neighbourhood factors and accelerometer-determined total sedentary time in adults. In total, 219 Dutch and 128 Belgian adults (mean age ± SD: 55.8 ± 15.4 years) were recruited between March and August 2014 as part of the European SPOTLIGHT project. Physical environmental neighbourhood factors, grouped into eight domains, i.e. walking, cycling, public transport, aesthetics, land use mix, grocery stores, food outlets and recreational facilities, were assessed using the SPOTLIGHT Virtual Audit Tool. Sedentary time was collected using ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers. General linear mixed models were conducted to examine associations between physical environmental neighbourhood factors and total sedentary time. Participants were sedentary, on average, for 542.9 min/day (SD: 84.3), or 9.1 h/day. None of the examined physical environmental neighbourhood factors were significantly related to total sedentary time. Our findings do not support associations of objectively measured physical environmental neighbourhood factors with adults' objectively sedentary time in Dutch and Belgian adults. More research on sedentary behaviours in settings such as the home and work setting is needed to examine the influence of more specific physical environmental factors on these context-specific sedentary behaviours. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
Netherlands | 3 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 12% |
Djibouti | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 6% |
Denmark | 1 | 6% |
Sweden | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 47% |
Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Design | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 35 | 46% |