You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomechanical and functional indicators in male semiprofessional soccer players with increased hip alpha angles vs. amateur soccer players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-88 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias Lahner, Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr, Philipp Alexander Walter, Carsten Lukas, Andreas Falarzik, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Lars Victor von Engelhardt, Christoph Abraham, Ewald M Hennig, Marco Hagen |
| Abstract |
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is predominant in young male athletes, but not much is known about gait differences in cases of increased hip alpha angles. In our study, the hip alpha angle of Nötzli of soccer players was quantified on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with axial oblique sequences. The aim of the current study was to compare the rearfoot motion and plantar pressure in male semiprofessional soccer players with increased alpha angles to age-matched amateur soccer players. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,003
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,457
of 224,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#41
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.