↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Biomechanical and functional indicators in male semiprofessional soccer players with increased hip alpha angles vs. amateur soccer players

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomechanical and functional indicators in male semiprofessional soccer players with increased hip alpha angles vs. amateur soccer players
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-88
Pubmed ID
24628720
Authors

Matthias Lahner, Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr, Philipp Alexander Walter, Carsten Lukas, Andreas Falarzik, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Lars Victor von Engelhardt, Christoph Abraham, Ewald M Hennig, Marco Hagen

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is predominant in young male athletes, but not much is known about gait differences in cases of increased hip alpha angles. In our study, the hip alpha angle of Nötzli of soccer players was quantified on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with axial oblique sequences. The aim of the current study was to compare the rearfoot motion and plantar pressure in male semiprofessional soccer players with increased alpha angles to age-matched amateur soccer players.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Professor 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 37 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 46 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,003
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,457
of 224,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#41
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.