↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna A Gogleva, Mikhail S Gelfand, Irena I Artamonova

Abstract

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a prokaryotic adaptive defence system that provides resistance against alien replicons such as viruses and plasmids. Spacers in a CRISPR cassette confer immunity against viruses and plasmids containing regions complementary to the spacers and hence they retain a footprint of interactions between prokaryotes and their viruses in individual strains and ecosystems. The human gut is a rich habitat populated by numerous microorganisms, but a large fraction of these are unculturable and little is known about them in general and their CRISPR systems in particular.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 133 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Researcher 35 24%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Computer Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 13 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,980,870
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,383
of 11,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,552
of 250,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#58
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.