You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sociodemographic, clinical and organisational factors associated with delayed hospital discharges: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jacopo Lenzi, Maria Mongardi, Paola Rucci, Eugenio Di Ruscio, Maria Vizioli, Concetta Randazzo, Elena Toschi, Tiziano Carradori, Maria Pia Fantini |
Abstract |
Evidence from studies conducted in Western countries indicates that a significant proportion of hospital beds are occupied by patients who experience a delayed hospital discharge (DHD). However, evidence about this topic is lacking in Italy, and little is known on the patients' and organisational characteristics that influence DHDs. Therefore, we carried out a survey in all the hospitals of a Northern Italian region to analyse the prevalence and the determinants of DHD. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
Other | 29 | 26% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 21% |
Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,172,995
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,444
of 7,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,178
of 221,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#71
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.