↓ Skip to main content

Sociodemographic, clinical and organisational factors associated with delayed hospital discharges: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sociodemographic, clinical and organisational factors associated with delayed hospital discharges: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacopo Lenzi, Maria Mongardi, Paola Rucci, Eugenio Di Ruscio, Maria Vizioli, Concetta Randazzo, Elena Toschi, Tiziano Carradori, Maria Pia Fantini

Abstract

Evidence from studies conducted in Western countries indicates that a significant proportion of hospital beds are occupied by patients who experience a delayed hospital discharge (DHD). However, evidence about this topic is lacking in Italy, and little is known on the patients' and organisational characteristics that influence DHDs. Therefore, we carried out a survey in all the hospitals of a Northern Italian region to analyse the prevalence and the determinants of DHD.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,679,508
of 26,525,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,366
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,743
of 236,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#74
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,525,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.