You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tailored implementation for chronic diseases (TICD): A project protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michel Wensing, Andy Oxman, Richard Baker, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Signe Flottorp, Joachim Szecsenyi, Jeremy Grimshaw, Martin Eccles |
| Abstract |
The assumption underlying tailoring is that implementation interventions are most helpful if these effectively address the most important determinants of practice for improvement in the targeted setting. The aim of the Tailored Implementation For Chronic Diseases (TICD) project is to develop valid and efficient methods of tailoring implementation interventions to determinants of practice for knowledge implementation in chronic illness care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Researcher | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,296,915
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,556
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,016
of 125,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.