↓ Skip to main content

Extreme sensitivity of gene expression in human SH-SY5Y neurocytes to ultra-low doses of Gelsemium sempervirens

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
155 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
42 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extreme sensitivity of gene expression in human SH-SY5Y neurocytes to ultra-low doses of Gelsemium sempervirens
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Marzotto, Debora Olioso, Maurizio Brizzi, Paola Tononi, Mirco Cristofoletti, Paolo Bellavite

Abstract

Gelsemium sempervirens L. (Gelsemium s.) is a traditional medicinal plant, employed as an anxiolytic at ultra-low doses and animal models recently confirmed this activity. However the mechanisms by which it might operate on the nervous system are largely unknown. This work investigates the gene expression of a human neurocyte cell line treated with increasing dilutions of Gelsemium s. extract.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Psychology 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#325,035
of 25,401,784 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#55
of 3,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,680
of 236,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.