↓ Skip to main content

A detailed gene expression study of the Miscanthusgenus reveals changes in the transcriptome associated with the rejuvenation of spring rhizomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A detailed gene expression study of the Miscanthusgenus reveals changes in the transcriptome associated with the rejuvenation of spring rhizomes
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-864
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Barling, Kankshita Swaminathan, Therese Mitros, Brandon T James, Juliette Morris, Ornella Ngamboma, Megan C Hall, Jessica Kirkpatrick, Magdy Alabady, Ashley K Spence, Matthew E Hudson, Daniel S Rokhsar, Stephen P Moose

Abstract

The Miscanthus genus of perennial C4 grasses contains promising biofuel crops for temperate climates. However, few genomic resources exist for Miscanthus, which limits understanding of its interesting biology and future genetic improvement. A comprehensive catalog of expressed sequences were generated from a variety of Miscanthus species and tissue types, with an emphasis on characterizing gene expression changes in spring compared to fall rhizomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 33%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 24%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,777,143
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,124
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,561
of 307,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#238
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.