You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics of evidence-based medicine training in Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine residencies - a national survey of program directors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Bednarczyk, Merril Pauls, Jason Fridfinnson, Erin Weldon |
| Abstract |
Recent surveys suggest few emergency medicine (EM) training programs have formal evidence-based medicine (EBM) or journal club curricula. Our primary objective was to describe the methods of EBM training in Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) EM residencies. Secondary objectives were to explore attitudes regarding current educational practices including e-learning, investigate barriers to journal club and EBM education, and assess the desire for national collaboration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Librarian | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 28% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,659,715
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#648
of 3,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,204
of 229,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#15
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.