You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-6834-7-40 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven D Brown, Shilpa Nagaraju, Sagar Utturkar, Sashini De Tissera, Simón Segovia, Wayne Mitchell, Miriam L Land, Asela Dassanayake, Michael Köpke |
| Abstract |
Clostridium autoethanogenum strain JA1-1 (DSM 10061) is an acetogen capable of fermenting CO, CO2 and H2 (e.g. from syngas or waste gases) into biofuel ethanol and commodity chemicals such as 2,3-butanediol. A draft genome sequence consisting of 100 contigs has been published. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 73 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,342,431
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#36
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,135
of 237,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.