↓ Skip to main content

Child mortality in the Democratic Republic of Congo: cross-sectional evidence of the effect of geographic location and prolonged conflict from a national household survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Child mortality in the Democratic Republic of Congo: cross-sectional evidence of the effect of geographic location and prolonged conflict from a national household survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala, Tumwaka P Mandungu, Kisumbula Mbela, Kikhela PD Nzita, Banza B Kalambayi, Kalambayi P Kayembe, Jacques B O Emina

Abstract

The child mortality rate is a good indicator of development. High levels of infectious diseases and high child mortality make the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) one of the most challenging environments for health development in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Recent conflicts in the eastern part of the country and bad governance have compounded the problem. This study aimed to examine province-level geographic variation in under-five mortality (U5M), accounting for individual- and household-level risk factors including environmental factors such as conflict.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 117 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 30%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,587,538
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,005
of 16,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,021
of 228,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#118
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.