↓ Skip to main content

Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries
Published in
Conflict and Health, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-5-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese McGinn, Judy Austin, Katherine Anfinson, Ribka Amsalu, Sara E Casey, Shihab Ibrahim Fadulalmula, Anne Langston, Louise Lee-Jones, Janet Meyers, Frederick Kintu Mubiru, Jennifer Schlecht, Melissa Sharer, Mary Yetter

Abstract

The present essay has as objective to critically analyze the current limitations of the family planning applied in public health and to consider changes considering the model of social sciences applied to health and the perspective of the family development. The proposal of this work appeared because of the high number of women who requested maternity assistance in the region of the Recôncavo of Bahia in the year of 2006. By analyzing the variables and methods involved in the family planning, it was possible to verify the following fault: responsibility and exclusive participation of the women, focus in the individual, the number of children as main goal of the planning, biological model, disrespect of the cultural aspects of the partner. In this essay we present the proposal of family planning of the perspective of the development that will be tested as a model of intervention in a future study.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Grenada 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 30%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Social Sciences 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 40 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,342,410
of 21,322,319 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#229
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,641
of 107,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,322,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them