You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The challenges and successes of implementing a sustainable antimicrobial resistance surveillance programme in Nepal
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-269 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarala Malla, Shyam Prakash Dumre, Geeta Shakya, Palpasa Kansakar, Bhupraj Rai, Anowar Hossain, Gopinath Balakrish Nair, M John Albert, David Sack, Stephen Baker, Motiur Rahman, The Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Programme team, Nepal |
Abstract |
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global public health concern and its surveillance is a fundamental tool for monitoring the development of AMR. In 1998, the Nepalese Ministry of Health (MOH) launched an Infectious Disease (ID) programme. The key components of the programme were to establish a surveillance programme for AMR and to develop awareness among physicians regarding AMR and rational drug usage in Nepal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
Researcher | 26 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 19% |
Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 22% |
Unknown | 39 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,020,700
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,045
of 15,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,094
of 224,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#202
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.