You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Q fever in the Netherlands: public perceptions and behavioral responses in three different epidemiological regions: a follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-263 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marloes Bults, Desirée Beaujean, Clementine Wijkmans, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Hélène Voeten |
| Abstract |
Over the past years, Q fever has become a major public health problem in the Netherlands, with a peak of 2,357 human cases in 2009. In the first instance, Q fever was mainly a local problem of one province with a high density of large dairy goat farms, but in 2009 an alarming increase of Q fever cases was observed in adjacent provinces. The aim of this study was to identify trends over time and regional differences in public perceptions and behaviors, as well as predictors of preventive behavior regarding Q fever. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,710,226
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,881
of 14,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,299
of 223,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#171
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.