You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of creatine supplementation associated with resistance training on oxidative stress in different tissues of rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-11-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Potrick Stefani, Ramiro Barcos Nunes, André Zuanazzi Dornelles, Jadson Pereira Alves, Marcella Ody Piva, Marlise Di Domenico, Cláudia Ramos Rhoden, Pedro Dal Lago |
| Abstract |
Creatine supplementation is known to exert an effect by increasing strength in high intensity and short duration exercises. There is a hypothesis which suggests that creatine supplementation may provide antioxidant activity by scavenging Reactive Oxygen Species. However, the antioxidant effect of creatine supplementation associated with resistance training has not yet been described in the literature. Therefore, we investigated the effect of creatine monohydrate supplementation associated with resistance training over maximum strength gain and oxidative stress in rats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,380,445
of 25,038,941 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#717
of 937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,974
of 436,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#649
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,038,941 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.