↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between CTX-II and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with a focal cartilage lesion of the knee: a prospective exploratory…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between CTX-II and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with a focal cartilage lesion of the knee: a prospective exploratory cohort study of 48 patients
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Harald Røtterud, Finn P Reinholt, Karen Johanne Beckstrøm, May Arna Risberg, Asbjørn Årøen

Abstract

C-telopeptide fragments of type II collagen (CTX-II) are created during articular cartilage breakdown and CTX-II is considered useful as a biomarker of osteoarthritis. The primary objective of the present study was to explore the relationship between urinary CTX-II concentration and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with isolated focal knee cartilage lesions. Furthermore, the secondary objective was to examine differences in urinary CTX-II concentration between patients with focal cartilage lesions and healthy controls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,296,915
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,450
of 4,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,635
of 223,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#65
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.