You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The New South Wales Allied Health Workplace Learning Study: barriers and enablers to learning in the workplace
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley Lloyd, Daniella Pfeiffer, Jacqueline Dominish, Gaynor Heading, David Schmidt, Annie McCluskey |
| Abstract |
Workplace learning refers to continuing professional development that is stimulated by and occurs through participation in workplace activities. Workplace learning is essential for staff development and high quality clinical care. The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers to and enablers of workplace learning for allied health professionals within NSW Health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,092,083
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,849
of 7,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,183
of 225,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#27
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.