↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cam Escoffery, Kirsten C Rodgers, Michelle C Kegler, Regine Haardörfer, David H Howard, Shuting Liang, Erika Pinsker, Katherine B Roland, Jennifer D Allen, Marcia G Ory, Roshan Bastani, Maria E Fernandez, Betsy C Risendal, Theresa L Byrd, Gloria D Coronado

Abstract

Special events are common community-based strategies for health promotion. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review on the impact of special events to promote breast, cervical or colorectal cancer education and screening.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 22 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,335,476
of 12,561,535 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,697
of 8,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,554
of 189,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,561,535 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them