You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cam Escoffery, Kirsten C Rodgers, Michelle C Kegler, Regine Haardörfer, David H Howard, Shuting Liang, Erika Pinsker, Katherine B Roland, Jennifer D Allen, Marcia G Ory, Roshan Bastani, Maria E Fernandez, Betsy C Risendal, Theresa L Byrd, Gloria D Coronado |
| Abstract |
Special events are common community-based strategies for health promotion. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review on the impact of special events to promote breast, cervical or colorectal cancer education and screening. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 71% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,998,058
of 24,059,832 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,430
of 15,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,713
of 227,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#126
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,059,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.