↓ Skip to main content

PaCO2 and alveolar dead space are more relevant than PaO2/FiO2 ratio in monitoring the respiratory response to prone position in ARDS patients: a physiological study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PaCO2 and alveolar dead space are more relevant than PaO2/FiO2 ratio in monitoring the respiratory response to prone position in ARDS patients: a physiological study
Published in
Critical Care, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyril Charron, Xavier Repesse, Koceïla Bouferrache, Laurent Bodson, Samuel Castro, Bernard Page, François Jardin, Antoine Vieillard-Baron

Abstract

Our aims in this study were to report changes in the ratio of alveolar dead space to tidal volume (VDalv/VT) in the prone position (PP) and to test whether changes in partial pressure of arterial CO2 (PaCO2) may be more relevant than changes in the ratio of partial pressure of arterial O2 to fraction of inspired O2 (PaO2/FiO2) in defining the respiratory response to PP. We also aimed to validate a recently proposed method of estimation of the physiological dead space (VDphysiol/VT) without measurement of expired CO2.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Other 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 31 27%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2011.
All research outputs
#22,958,977
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#6,417
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,934
of 130,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#46
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.