↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing adherence to regular exercise in middle-aged women: a qualitative study to inform clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing adherence to regular exercise in middle-aged women: a qualitative study to inform clinical practice
Published in
BMC Women's Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-14-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deanne McArthur, Alex Dumas, Kirsten Woodend, Sarah Beach, Dawn Stacey

Abstract

About half of women decrease their regular exercise during middle age. Concurrently, they experience a reduction in basal metabolic rate and loss of lean muscle as they transition to menopause. The combined effects place these women at increased risk for body weight gain and associated co-morbidities. Further research is required to better assess their barriers to regular exercise and to develop more applied knowledge aimed to improve the applicability of clinical interventions aimed at this population. The main aim of this study was to identify enablers and barriers influencing adherence to regular exercise in middle-aged women who exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 233 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 17%
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Researcher 16 7%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 62 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 15%
Sports and Recreations 33 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 11%
Psychology 21 9%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,561,264
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#118
of 1,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,835
of 224,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.