↓ Skip to main content

Creating scenarios of the impact of copd and their relationship to copd assessment test (CAT™) scores

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creating scenarios of the impact of copd and their relationship to copd assessment test (CAT™) scores
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-11-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W Jones, Margaret Tabberer, Wen-Hung Chen

Abstract

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) is a new short health status measure for routine use. New questionnaires require reference points so that users can understand the scores; descriptive scenarios are one way of doing this. A novel method of creating scenarios is described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,293,967
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,363
of 1,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,829
of 120,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.