↓ Skip to main content

Creating scenarios of the impact of copd and their relationship to copd assessment test (CAT™) scores

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creating scenarios of the impact of copd and their relationship to copd assessment test (CAT™) scores
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-11-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W Jones, Margaret Tabberer, Wen-Hung Chen

Abstract

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) is a new short health status measure for routine use. New questionnaires require reference points so that users can understand the scores; descriptive scenarios are one way of doing this. A novel method of creating scenarios is described.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 37 28%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 27 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2011.
All research outputs
#9,934,829
of 12,410,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#678
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,794
of 86,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,410,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them