You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
mHealth and global mental health: still waiting for the mH2 wedding?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Globalization and Health, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-10-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Conor Farrington, Angela Aristidou, Kai Ruggeri |
Abstract |
Two phenomena have become increasingly visible over the past decade: the significant global burden of disease arising from mental illness and the rapid acceleration of mobile phone usage in poorer countries. Mental ill-health accounts for a significant proportion of global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and years lived with disability (YLDs), especially in poorer countries where a number of factors combine to exacerbate issues of undertreatment. Yet poorer countries have also witnessed significant investments in, and dramatic expansions of, mobile coverage and usage over the past decade. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 21 | 36% |
United States | 6 | 10% |
Canada | 5 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
Scientists | 8 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 194 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 42 | 21% |
Researcher | 28 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Other | 46 | 23% |
Unknown | 24 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 20% |
Psychology | 40 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
Computer Science | 16 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 19% |
Unknown | 35 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#820,656
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#108
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,716
of 238,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.